Wednesday, December 12, 2018

Media and information literacy friday


Instruction :For GAS Students only
                     Comment what you feel and what do you think is the moral of the story

The  Deed

Once upon a time Shree Krishna and Arjun went for a short stroll around the city. They saw a poor looking priest begging. Arjun felt pity at him and he gave him a bag full of 100 gold coins. The priest became very happy and thanked Arjun. He left for his home. On way, he saw another person who needed help. The priest could have spared a coin or two to help that person. however, he chose to ignore it. But on way to his home, one thief robbed him of his bag of coins and ran away.

The priest became dejected and went back again for begging. Next day again when Arjun saw the same priest begging and he was surprised that after getting a bag full of coins which can last a lifetime, the priest was still begging! He called the priest and asked him the reason for this. The priest told him about the whole incident and Arjun again felt pity at him. So, this time he gave him a diamond.

The priest became very happy and left for home and he again saw someone who needed help but he chose to ignore again. Upon reaching home, he safely put the diamond in an empty pot of water with a plan to cash it out later and live a wealthy life. His wife was not at home. He was very tired so he decided to take a nap. In between, his wife came home and picked up that empty pot of water, walked towards the river close by to fill up the water. She had not noticed the diamond in the pot. Upon arriving at the river, she put the whole pot into the running river water to fill it up. She filled up the pot but the diamond was gone with the water flow!

When the priest woke up, he went to see the pot and asked his wife about the diamond. She told him, she had not noticed it and it must have been lost in the river. The priest couldn’t believe his bad luck and again started begging. Again Arjun and Shree Krishna saw him begging and Arjun inquired about it. Arjun felt bad and started thinking if this priest will ever have a happy life.

Shree Krishna who is an incarnation of God smiled. Shree Krishna gave that priest one coin which was not even enough for buying a lunch or dinner for one person. Arjun asked Shree Krishna, “Lord, I gave him gold coins and diamond, which could have given him a wealthy life, yet it didn’t help him. How will just one coin help this poor guy?” Shree Krishna smiled and told Arjun to follow that priest and find out.

On the way, the priest was thinking that one coin Shree Krishna gave him, he can’t even buy a lunch for one person. Why would he give so little? He saw a fisherman who was getting a fish out of his net. Fish was struggling. The priest felt pity at fish. He thought that this one coin won’t solve my problem, why not I save that fish. So the priest paid the fisherman and took the fish. He put the fish in his small pot of water which he always carried with him.

The fish was struggling in a small pot of water, ended up throwing out a diamond from the mouth! The priest screamed with a joy, “I got it, I got it”. At that same point, the thief who had robbed the priest’s bag of 100 gold coins, was passing through there. He thought that the priest recognized him and may get him punished. He got nervous and ran to the priest. He apologized to the priest and returned his bag full of 100 gold coins. The priest couldn’t believe what just happened.

Arjun saw all this and said, “Oh Lord, Now I understand your play”.

media and information literacy

Instruction :For  ICT Intensity  Students only
                     Comment what you feel and what do you think is the moral of the story

The King and a Sage

A Sage was passing through the capital city of the famous king. While he was walking, he noticed a single currency coin on the road. He picked it up. He was satisfied with his simple living and he had no use of that coin. So, he planned to donate it to the one who is in need of it. He strolled around the streets throughout the day but didn’t find anyone such. Finally, he reached the rest area and spent a night there.
Next morning, he wakes up in the morning for his daily activities and sees that a king is going for his invasion of another state with his war ready army. When the king saw the sage standing, he ordered his army to be stopped. He came to the Sage and said, “Oh Great Sage, I am going to war to win another state so that my state can be expanded. So bless me to be victorious”.
After thinking, Sage gave a single currency coin to the king! The king was confused and annoyed with this because what use he has for a single coin while he is already one of the richest kings! He curiously asked a sage, “what’s the meaning of this one coin?”
A Sage explained, “Oh Great King! I found this coin yesterday while strolling around the streets of your capital city. But I had no use of it. So, I had decided that I will donate it to someone needy. I strolled around till the evening in your capital, but found no one such. Everyone was living a happy life. It seemed that they were satisfied with what they had. So I found no one to give this coin. But today, the king of this state, still have the desire to gain more and not satisfied with what he already has, I felt you were in need of this coin.”
The King realized his mistake and gave up the planned war.

Media and information literacy

Instruction :For  ABM Students girls only
                     Comment what you feel and what do you think is the moral of the story 


Sometimes

Once Buddha was walking from one town to another town with a few of his followers. This was in the initial days. While they were traveling, they happened to pass a lake. They stopped there and Buddha told one of his disciples, “I am thirsty. Please get me some water from that lake there”.
The disciple walked up to the lake. When he reached it, he noticed that some people were washing clothes in the water and, right at that moment, a bullock cart started crossing the lake right at the edge of it. As a result, the water became very muddy, very turbid. The disciple thought, “How can I give this muddy water to Buddha to drink?!” So he came back and told the Buddha, “The water in there is very muddy. I don’t think it is fit to drink”.
So, the Buddha said, let us take a little rest here by the tree. After about half an hour, again Buddha asked the same disciple to go back to the lake and get him some water to drink. The disciple obediently went back to the lake. This time he found that the lake had absolutely clear water in it. The mud had settled down and the water above it looked fit to be had. So he collected some water in a pot and brought it to the Buddha.
The Buddha looked at the water, and then he looked up at the disciple and said, “See, You let the water be and the mud settled down on its own. You got a clear water. It didn’t require any effort”.

media and information literacy

 Instruction :For  ABM Students boys only
                     Comment what you feel and what do you think is the moral of the story
                     
                     

A Man with a Lamp

Once upon a time, there was a small town. There lived a man by himself who couldn’t see. He was blind. Yet, he carried a lighted lamp with him whenever he went out at night.
One night as he was coming home after having a dinner outside, he came across a group of young travelers. They saw that he was blind, yet carrying a lighted lamp. They started passing comments on him and made a fun of him. One of them asked him, “Hey Man! You are blind and can’t see anything! Why do you carry the lamp then?!”
The blind man replied, “Yes, unfortunately, I am blind and I can’t see anything but a lighted lamp which I am carrying is for the people like you who can see. You may not see the blind man coming and end up pushing me. That is why I carry a lighted lamp”.

Monday, October 1, 2018

Do you agree or disagree defend your stand

 
Tito Sotto files bill lowering age of criminal liability

Paolo Romero (The Philippine Star) - September 26, 2018 - 12:00am
MANILA, Philippines — Senate President Vicente Sotto III is pushing for the lowering of the age of criminal responsibility to 12 years and one day, owing to what he said was the alarming rise in the number of crimes involving minors.
Sotto filed Senate Bill 2026 seeking to amend Republic Act 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, which exempts children aged 15 and below from criminal liability.
“This bill will finally give clarity to the true intention of the law. The amendment to the law will institutionalize the criminal liability of teenagers who commit serious criminal offense,” Sotto said yesterday.
“Not only was the law abused by criminals but the innocence of these youngsters was deliberately taken from them,” he added.
He said criminal syndicates are exploiting the provisions of RA 9344 by using minors in the commission of crimes.
Citing a study conducted by the Child Rights International Network, Sotto said the average minimum age of criminal responsibility in Asia and Africa is 11. In the US and Europe, it is 13.
In his explanatory note to the bill, Sotto said that due to the continuing challenge in the implementation of RA 9344, as amended, the law must be further amended to lower the minimum age of criminal liability in order to adapt to the changing times.
He cited several viral videos showing children aged 15 and below beating each other to death, dragging an old man out of a public utility vehicle to steal his purse and taking the earnings of a jeepney driver.
There are also several cases where minors are being used as runners or couriers of drug syndicates because they would not be held criminally liable under the law.
The children caught for these crimes are released back into society and many of them end up as repeat offenders.
The measure seeks to amend Sections 6, 20, 20-A, 20-B and 22 of RA 9344, as amended so that a child below 18 years old but over 12 at the time of the commission of the crime can be held criminally liable and subjected to the appropriate proceedings, unless proven that he acted without discernment.
In cases where a child is proven to have acted without discernment, he will be exempt from criminal liability and subjected to appropriate intervention program under the law.
Under the bill, children aged over nine to 12 years who committed serious crimes such as parricide, murder, infanticide, kidnapping and homicide are deemed neglected children as provided under Presidential Decree 603 or the Child and Youth Welfare Code as amended.
They will be placed in a special facility within the youth care faculty or Bahay Pag-asa.
Sotto said he would ensure adequate funding in the proposed 2019 national budget for the upgrading and construction of new youth care facilities.

Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/09/26/1854844/tito-sotto-files-bill-lowering-age-criminal-liability#SIdQbAPR79SofuRX.99
UNICEF calls Sotto’s proposal lowering criminal liability ‘giant leap backward’

Gaea Katreena Cabico (philstar.com) - September 27, 2018 - 6:13pm
MANILA, Philippines — Instead of lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility, the government should improve the implementation of the existing juvenile law.
The United Nations Children's Fund stressed this point Thursday, expressing strong opposition to the proposal of Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 13 years old from the current 15.
Earlier this week, Sotto filed Senate Bill 2026, which amends several sections of Republic Act 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006.
UNICEF called the senator’s proposal a “giant leap backward.”
“To brand children as criminals removes the responsibility and accountability from adults who have failed them. Children in conflict with the law are victims of circumstance, mostly because of poverty and because they are not able to access a caring, nurturing and protective environment,” it said.
UNICEF added: “By lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility, syndicate groups who exploit children into committing crimes for them, will instead use and abuse even younger children to commit their wrongdoings.”
UNICEF stressed that already disadvantaged children should be protected, not detained.
Under the proposed measure, children above nine years old to 12 years old would be deemed neglected under the Child and Youth Welfare Code if they commit serious crimes such as parricide, murder, infanticide, kidnapping and homicide. They would be placed within a youth care facility or Bahay Pag-asa.
“A 12-year-old child is not yet even a teenager. A nine-year-old child has not yet even reached the standard age of puberty. These ages are too young and exposing them to the harshness of the criminal justice system, where even adults are rightly intimidated, is a grave wrongdoing,” the body said.
Child Rights International Network earlier said Sotto’s proposal will only draw more children into the criminal justice system instead of addressing the issue.

Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/09/27/1855227/unicef-calls-sottos-proposal-lowering-criminal-liability-giant-leap-backward#VzTmpxKwtSQmyYO8.99
 

Monday, February 26, 2018

       THE NOTION OF CONSTRUCTED AUDIENCES 

    TARGET AUDIENCE 
                  => is best defined as a specific group of people identified and aggregated from selected population segments who are intended users. The information generated from them helps  publishers and producers develop media messages that will attract this group help them recommend products that will potentially attractive and useful to this target audience. 

HOW AUDIENCES ARE CONSTRUCTED


SHAUN MOORES (1993) 
          =>asserts that the audience is hot a homogeneous category and that it is  best to see it in its plurality. 

RALWAY (1998)
           => thinks that the word "audience" has indeed evolved from face-to-face interaction in one shared physical space to include how consumers of electronic media and information. 

USUALLY THE ATTRIBUTES OF THE AUDIENCE CAN BE SUMMED UP BY GEARS :

*G-ender
*E-thnicity
*A-ge range 
*R-egion or nationality 
*S-ocio-economic group 

TRADITIONAL SEGMENTATION MODEL


SOCIAL              SOCIAL                     OCCUPA-
GRADE            STATISTICS                    TION

A          ---------- Upper middle  ------ Professio-
                                Class                nal w/ study 
                                                         base income
B         ----------- Middle class    -------  Adminis-
                                                              trative
C-1      ----------- Lower middle ---Supervirsory
                                Class
C-2      ----------- Skilled working ----Skilled ma-
                                Class               nual workers
D         ---------- Working Class ------- Unskilled 
                                                              workers
E         ----------  Poorest at the ------ Lowest gra-
                            poor                     de workers


THE CROSS CULTURAL CONSUMER CHARACTERIZATION (4's):

° THE ASPIRER
° THE MAINSTREAM
° THE STRUCTURE
° THE REFORMER
° THE EXPLORER
° THE SUCCEEDER
° THE RESIGNED
 

RONALD VINCENT ZERRUDO II
SHERRY ANN DALIGDIG 
                      




E-tech 11 4th quarter week 1

  Activity 1: Instruction : Follow the steps. (5   points each number)   1.        SEARCH   tiktok user @sittieaiesa LIKE & FOLLO...